biote



progressive design and web

we design effective communications solutions.
we develop websites and applications, including dynamic
content, e-commerce and hosting.
Read more about us or what we do.

Yes, we also blog. 

 

 

Archive for June, 2011

Making your logo ethical

Saturday, June 25th, 2011

I had this thought a number of years ago, that companies can freely use any iconography they like within their branding. For instance, they could use a kiwi or a lion in their logo or as a character. There’s little ethical consideration to this – the main concern is legal as existing trademarks. But there’s no cultural motivation to check this with anyone, which is quite different to using indigenous cultural symbolism (ok, there are no laws about this, but unconsidered use doesn’t do you any favours). So I thought, how ethical is this?

Human activity has instigated a new era of extinction and most of the world’s charismatic mega-fauna are threatened… well, it’s not just them – the world’s biodiversity is threatened. (We had the pleasure of helping DOC out with some of their Year of Biodiversity promotion.) So who pays the costs of conservation? Governments, environmental preservation agencies? So why not businesses who extract symbolic value from an animal?

This was the exact idea that motivated Save Your Logo, which set itself up to help involve companies to contribute and support actions of biodiversity. Neat! Of course, they have a general focus on key endangered species – not everything is covered.

The ideal would be for companies to be aware of – and grateful for – the cultural symbolic value that supports their business proposition. So, if you’re a business, or a designer, have a think about the ethical implications and find a way to support appropriate preservation initiatives. No doubt there are PR benefits, but the real benefit is that you are not just thinking of your own fate but acknowledging the relationship and shared fate you have with another entity in the web of life that connects us all.

Effective branding for non-profits

Monday, June 13th, 2011

We’ve produced communications materials for a wide range of non-profit organisations (that’s the kind of work we do!). It always surprises me how disorganised their identities are –  often poorly supplied logo files and poor visual documentation. Sure, we understand that many non-profits have tight budgets, but a little invested in the organisation’s key visual indicator can pay off dividends. It’s not just about looking good though – it’s about communicating effectively – something that has become increasingly important for non-profits in a message-saturated mediascape.

Three key ways to support your organisation’s image through brand use are:

Keep it consistent. Inconsistency looks messy and projects an image of a disorganised organisation. Consistency is about knowing what you’re communicating and to whom, and keeping the message on-target – and the same each time. If you’re not keeping your message clear and consistent you end up diluting its impact and confusing your audience.

Use a style guide. This is simply a document that acts as a template for how your logo, fonts, colours, images and application should be used. It helps keep things looking consistent. Many clients we’ve worked for had a logo but no information on how it should – and shouldn’t – be used. The result is often a random array of application. Developing a style guide is not difficult and will help you be more effective in the long run. Download an example of a simplified style guide.

Know when to DIY and when not to.
A style guide can also include templates for basic in-house production of items. This means you can still do it yourself AND keep it consistent (great!). However, we see clients trying to produce important external communications themselves – often in Word! If it’s important, believe me, you’re better to hire an expert and get in done right – using the right tools. The end result is going to be much more effective in looking good, getting the message across – and getting the intended results.